Description

Retracement II – 1.5 Contact Hours
The case-in-chief is Dykes v. Arnold, Oregon 2006. Again, we have two surveyors and two different results based on their varying approaches to the project. The basic question asked and answered by this case is: What does it mean to “retrace” a survey? This case has many of the surveying details that are often lacking in court opinions. It also deals with intent, ambiguities, and repose. This is a 2-Page Letter covering 1 Court Opinion consisting of 17 pages. This 19-Page document has a 10-Question examination based on the text of the newsletter and the case-in-chief.

OBJECTIVES: To enhance professional competency and improve practitioner’s knowledge of the law as it relates to the practice of land surveying.