Description

Deed Interpretation II – 3.0 Contact Hours
The case-in-chief is Elton v. Davis, Missouri 2003, involving the interpretation of a metes and bounds deed description where the deed doesn’t match the improvements. The secondary and supporting case is Hall v. Staley, North Carolina 2003, where parol evidence became the deciding factor in the proper interpretation of an ambiguous deed. This is a 3-Page Letter covering 2 Court Opinions consisting of 9 pages. This 12-Page document has a 10-Question examination based on the text of the newsletter and the attached cases.

OBJECTIVES: To enhance professional competency and improve practitioner’s knowledge of the law as it relates to the practice of land surveying.