Boundary Establishment V – 1.5 Contact Hours
The case-in-chief, Huntington v. Riggs, Indiana 2007, resurrects the doctrine of boundary by acquiescence in the State of Indiana after a long “winter’s-nap,” so to speak. Acquiescence is alive and well in Indiana and the Court refreshes this doctrine for the new millennium. In addition to the case-in-chief, we have included as a bonus Wingler v. Simpson, Indiana 1884; Adams v. Betz, Indiana 1906; Bubacz v. Kirk, Indiana 1930; and Freiburger v. Fry, Indiana 1982. These bonus cases along with the case-in-chief constitute the essential opinions under Indiana law on the doctrine of acquiescence. No Indiana surveyor (or any other surveyor) should be without these essential cases on acquiescence. This is a 2-Page Letter covering 1 Court Opinion consisting of 11 pages. This 28-Page document (including bonus cases) has a 10-Question examination based on the text of the newsletter and the case-in-chief. The bonus cases are not tested.
OBJECTIVES: To enhance professional competency and improve practitioner’s knowledge of the law as it relates to the practice of land surveying.